Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Law Offices of Art Kalantar Motto
  • HEALTHCARE LAW

What to Do During a Healthcare Audit

Close-up of professional writing financial report on clipboard at office desk with laptop and smartphone. Concept of analysis, documentation, planning, and consulting work.

For healthcare providers in California, receiving notice of a Medicare or Medi-Cal audit can be unsettling. Whether initiated by a Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC), Unified Program Integrity Contractor (UPIC), Medicaid Integrity Contractor (MIC), or another agency, an audit is more than just a paperwork exercise. It is often the first step in a process that can lead to repayment demands, administrative penalties, or even fraud investigations.

How you respond during an audit can significantly influence the outcome. A disorganized or overly casual approach can raise red flags, while a strategic and measured response can help contain the scope of the review and protect your practice. The Law Offices of Art Kalantar in Los Angeles represents healthcare providers across California in Medicare and Medi-Cal audits, investigations, and enforcement actions, and understands how critical this stage can be.

Take the Audit Notice Seriously From the Start

One of the most common mistakes providers make is underestimating the significance of an audit notice. Even if the request appears routine, it should be treated as a formal legal matter. Audit notices often contain strict deadlines, specific document requests, and instructions that must be followed carefully.

Ignoring or delaying a response can escalate the situation quickly. Auditors may interpret non-responsiveness as noncompliance, which can lead to adverse findings, payment suspensions, or expanded investigations. The moment an audit notice is received, it should be reviewed carefully and, in most cases, shared with legal counsel.

Identify the Scope and Purpose of the Audit

Not all audits are the same. Some are limited to a small sample of claims, while others involve broader reviews of billing patterns or specific services. Understanding who is conducting the audit and what they are looking for is essential.

A focused audit may involve a handful of claims, while a program integrity investigation may examine systemic billing practices over an extended period. Clarifying the scope allows providers to tailor their response and avoid producing unnecessary or potentially harmful information.

Organize and Review Documents Before Submission

Audits typically require the production of medical records, billing documentation, and supporting materials. Before submitting anything, providers should carefully review all documents for completeness, accuracy, and consistency.

Incomplete or disorganized records can create the impression of poor compliance. More importantly, inconsistencies between documentation and billing data may raise additional questions or lead to adverse conclusions. A thorough internal review helps identify and address issues before they are presented to auditors.

At the same time, providers should avoid altering records after the fact. Any changes to documentation once an audit has begun may be viewed as suspicious or even as an attempt to conceal information. Instead, if clarifications are necessary, they should be made transparently and, ideally, with guidance from legal counsel.

Limit Communications and Avoid Informal Explanations

During an audit, it is natural for providers to want to explain their practices or justify their billing decisions. However, informal explanations, especially those made without preparation, can create unintended consequences.

Statements made to auditors may be documented and later used in administrative or legal proceedings. Even well-intentioned comments can be misinterpreted or taken out of context. For this reason, communications with auditors should be controlled, concise, and consistent.

Having a single point of contact, often a compliance officer or attorney, helps ensure that responses are coordinated and accurate. Staff should be instructed not to engage directly with auditors unless specifically authorized to do so.

Stay Within the Requested Scope

A common mistake during audits is overproduction of documents. While it is important to comply fully with audit requests, providing information beyond what is requested can expand the scope of the review. Auditors may use additional documents to identify new issues or broaden their inquiry. A disciplined approach that responds precisely to what has been requested and nothing more helps limit unnecessary exposure.

Document the Audit Process Internally

Maintaining an internal record of the audit process is essential. This includes tracking what documents were requested, what was produced, and when communications occurred. Keeping detailed records ensures that the provider can respond effectively to follow-up inquiries and maintain consistency throughout the process. Internal documentation is also valuable if the audit results in an appeal or further investigation. It provides a clear record of how the provider responded and can help identify any misunderstandings or errors in the auditor’s findings.

Be Prepared for Potential Outcomes

Audits can result in a range of outcomes, from no findings to significant repayment demands. In some cases, auditors may identify overpayments and seek recoupment. In others, findings may lead to extrapolated damages, where alleged errors are projected across a larger universe of claims. More serious cases may be referred to enforcement agencies for further investigation. Understanding these potential outcomes allows providers to prepare strategically and avoid being caught off guard.

If adverse findings are issued, providers typically have the right to appeal. The appeals process can be complex and time-sensitive, making early preparation and legal guidance essential.

Involve a Healthcare Defense Attorney Early

Perhaps the most important step a provider can take during an audit is involving experienced legal counsel early in the process. A healthcare defense attorney can help interpret the audit notice, guide document production, manage communications, and develop a strategy tailored to the provider’s specific situation.

Early legal involvement can also help prevent escalation. By ensuring that responses are accurate, organized, and compliant, counsel can reduce the likelihood that an audit will evolve into a broader investigation or enforcement action.

The Law Offices of Art Kalantar has extensive experience representing California healthcare providers in Medicare and Medi-Cal audits, fraud investigations, and healthcare criminal defense matters. Our firm works closely with providers to protect their rights, challenge improper findings, and navigate complex regulatory processes.

Protect Your Practice at Every Stage

A healthcare audit is not just an administrative review; it is a critical moment that can shape the future of your practice. Providers who respond strategically, maintain strong documentation, and seek experienced legal guidance are far better positioned to achieve favorable outcomes.

If your California medical practice is undergoing an audit or has received a notice of review, taking immediate and informed action is essential. The Law Offices of Art Kalantar is prepared to help you navigate the process, protect your interests, and ensure that your response is both effective and compliant. Contact our office in Beverly Hills for help throughout Los Angeles and statewide.

 

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation